Тут не исправить уже ничего, Господь, жги! Войти !bnw Сегодня Клубы
Привет, TbI — HRWKA! 1136.0 пользователей не могут ошибаться!
?6434
прекрасное6231
говно5824
говнорашка5322
хуита4250
anime2902
linux2496
bnw2453
music2351
log2124
рашка2058
pic1880
ололо1807
быдло1424
украина1395
сталирасты1382
дыбр1178
гімно1158
роботы_не_одобряют1005
bnw_ppl992

У меня приступ идиотизма: > A Letter is a joy of Earth — > It is denied the Gods — Я понимаю общий смысл, но не понимаю как это грамматически работает. Мне хочется переломать предлоги во второй строчке, но там нет ошибки (https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Letter_is_a_joy_of_Earth_%E2%80%94).
#3768YS (11) / @stiletto / 94 дня назад

есть ли какой-то годный скрипт на питоне, которому скармливаешь англ слово и получаешь транскрипцию этого слова?

нашёл что-то более-менее годное: https://github.com/mphilli/English-to-IPA, но всё равно не оч

или правильнее дёргать словарь, или онлайн-сервис какой-то? подскажите, а то хочу научить anki одной командой добавлять новые слова с переводами и транскрипцией

#NWU6IF (1) / @soko1 / 305 дней назад
чот не могу найти правило в ангельском, согласно которому перед фамилией/псевдонимом тильда ставится при цитировании. "Хуй. Пизда" ~Джигурда ет действительно так или происки современных пидарасиков? встречаю довольно часто в последнее время
#OU58PX (2) / @anonymous / 307 дней назад

Написал очередного бота для изучения английского. Принцип прост: шлёшь боту любое англ слово и получаешь файл с начиткой этого слова носителем языка.

Try it: https://t.me/pronouncewordbot

Думал добавить ещё UK начитку на выбор, но тогда пришлось бы ещё БД вести с юзерскими настройками, поэтому пока забил. Ещё как варик - сразу два варианта присылать, но хз надо ли.

Столкнулся с одной проблемой: телега не останавливается после воспроизведения файла и начинает проигрывать все ранее загруженные файлы в мобильной версии под Android. В данном случае это совершенно неприемлемо. Можно ли как-то на это программно влиять?

#YPKIR9 (12) / @soko1 / 329 дней назад

Написал телеграм-бота для неправильных глаголов. Шлёшь ему любую из трёх форм, либо перевод, а он тебе присылает три формы + перевод.
В базе на данный момент 255 слов. Если чего вдруг не найдёте - сообщайте. Ещё планирую добавить транскрипцию со временем, но пока лень.

http://t.me/beganbegunbot

#APMMON (8+1) / @soko1 / 348 дней назад
Высрал кароч мнемонику для самых маленьких: A - это когда пытаешься подобрать слово для какой-то штуки и произносишь "эээ" в размышлениях о наиболее подходящем классе. The - это когда хочешь сказать that, но лень.
#FK41I3 (0) / @l29ah / 364 дня назад
А пока гендерные учёные рассказывают, как проклятые буржуазные белые супремасисты отбирали у покорённых народов железные дороги, автомобили, туалетную бумагу и микроволновки, я, оказывается, уже как год назад репостил статью "How Africa Got Left Behind" #WYBMAE
#I12F8G (10+9) / @o01eg / 391 день назад
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1039309513/glow-1-2 "Glow is an ongoing comic series by Ray Chou and Vincenzo Ferriero with art by Anny Maulina and Dia Jia. Glow takes place in a world where magic catalyzed both industrial revolution and nuclear holocaust. Half a millennia ago, an ancient and powerful empire known as Nymera developed a means to channel and store magical energy into a sticky blue substance known as anima, storing them into massive Towers across the world."
#1ADV3J (0+1) / @o01eg / 587 дней назад
полиглот охуенная тема! сдал базовую форму глагола на пятерочку //заебался правда опечатаваться, мне type gestures постоянно he на she заменял, ебаный матриархат. зато теперь все от зубов отскакивает https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.axidep.polyglotfull - тут 3.18, если кому жалко ста рублев, могу поделиться крякнутой 1.54, я ее начал пару лет назад проходить, но забил. а зря
#8HNR68 (13) / @anonymous / 622 дня назад
til human == humans we are human
#WSSUKH (6) / @mugiseyebrows / 686 дней назад
чот я невдуплю, можно ли перевести thy как свой/своё?
#8NW779 (1) / @anonymous / 744 дня назад
У Неандертальцев был крупнее мозг, сильнее тело, но они были первобытными коммунистами. Кроманьонцы были слабее их, но они были первобытными капиталистами. Как всегда, рыночек порешал. Вымершие неандертальцы — вот до какой исторической черты коммунисты хотят деградировать людей: https://fee.org/articles/trade-is-what-makes-us-human/ "In the blockbuster 2015 book Sapiens, Yuval Noah Harari pointed out that our species has conducted intergroup trade for tens of thousands of years, but that other species of hominids never did: “Archaeologists excavating 30,000 year old Sapiens sites in the European heartland occasionally find there seashells from the Mediterranean and Atlantic coasts. In all likelihood, these shells got to the continental interior through long-distance trade between different Sapiens bands. Neanderthal sites lack any evidence of such trade. Each group manufactured its own tools from local materials…” He argues that this is what gave homo sapiens a decisive competitive advantage over our distant cousins, who in some cases actually had bigger brains than us. However, Harari is not the first to make this argument. In his 2010 book The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves, Matt Ridley made and elaborated on the same point and the same argument. Ridley also noted the archaeological evidence of far-flung trade networks among homo sapiens. Ridley helpfully distinguishes between true trade and the other kinds of reciprocity that occur throughout the animal kingdom: “I am not talking about swapping favours — any old primate can do that. There is plenty of ‘reciprocity’ in monkeys and apes: you scratch my back and I scratch yours. (…) Such reciprocity is an important human social glue, a source of cooperation and a habit inherited from the animal past that undoubtedly prepared human beings for exchange. But it is not the same thing as exchange. Reciprocity means giving each other the same thing (usually) at different times. Exchange — call it barter or trade if you like — means giving each other different things (usually) at the same time: simultaneously swapping two different objects. In Adam Smith’s words, ‘Give me that which I want, and you shall have this which you want.’” Inventing inter-band trade was quite an achievement, Ridley remarks, especially given: “…the homicidal relationships between tribes. Famously, no other species of ape can encounter strangers without trying to kill them, and the instinct still lurks in the human breast. But by 82,000 years ago, human beings had overcome this problem sufficiently to be able to pass Nassarius shells hand to hand 125 miles inland.” Ridley compares the trade networks of our ancestors to the isolationism of Neanderthal bands: “This is in striking contrast to the Neanderthals, whose stone tools were virtually always made from raw material available within an hour’s walk of where the tool was used. To me this is a vital clue to why the Neanderthals were still making hand axes, while their African-origin competitors were making ever more types of tool. Without trade, innovation just does not happen. Exchange is to technology as sex is to evolution. It stimulates novelty. The remarkable thing about the moderns of west Asia is not so much the diversity of artefacts as the continual innovation. There is more invention between 80,000 and 20,000 years ago than there had been in the previous million. By today’s standards, it was very slow, but by the standards of Homo erectus it was lightning-fast. And the next ten millennia would see still more innovations: fish hooks, all sorts of implements, domesticated wolves, wheat, figs, sheep, money.” Neanderthals were individually stronger than us and had bigger brains. They were clever enough to make tools and weapons, to speak, to think conceptually, to create art, and to develop culture. But, they were incapable of trade relations outside the familial band, and that doomed them to many millennia of economic and technological stagnation."
#3SJW3B (17+1) / @o01eg / 776 дней назад
http://humanprogress.org/blog/how-africa-got-left-behind "African poverty was not caused by colonialism, capitalism or free trade. As I have noted before, many of Europe’s former dependencies became rich precisely because they maintained many of the colonial institutions and partook in global trade. African poverty preceded the continent’s contact with Europe and persists today. That is an outcome of unfortunate policy choices, most of which were freely chosen by Africa’s leaders after independence. Like Europe, Africa started out desperately poor. The late Professor Angus Maddison of Groningen University has estimated that, at the start of the Common Era, average per capita income in Africa was $470 per year (in 1990 dollars). The global average was roughly equal to that of Africa. Western Europe and North Africa, which were parts of the Roman Empire, were slightly better off ($600). In contrast, North America lagged behind Africa ($400). All in all, the world was both fairly equal and very poor. The origins of global inequality, which saw Western Europe and, later, North America, power ahead of the rest of the world, can be traced to the rise of the Northern Italian city states in the 14th century and the Renaissance in the 15th century. By 1500, a typical European was about twice as rich as a typical African. But the real gap in living standards opened only after the Industrial Revolution that started in England in the late 18th century and spread to Europe and North America in the 19th century. In 1870, when Europeans controlled no more than 10 per cent of the African continent (mostly North and South Africa), Western European incomes were already four times higher than those in Africa. Europe, in other words, did not need Africa in order to become prosperous. Europe colonised Africa because Europe was prosperous and, consequently, more powerful. Appreciation of the chronology of events does not justify or defend colonialism. But it does help explain it. Africa’s fortunes under colonial rule varied. Much progress was made in terms of health and education. Maddison estimates that in 1870, there were 91 million Africans. By 1960, the year of independence, the African population grew more than threefold – to 285 million. The OECD estimates that over the same time period the share of the African population attending school rose from less than 5 per cent to over 20 per cent. On the down side, Europeans treated Africans with contempt, and subjected them to discrimination and, sometimes, violence. That violence intensified during Africa’s struggle for independence, as the colonial powers tried to beat back African nationalists. As a result, African leaders took over countries where repression of political dissent was already firmly established. Instead of repealing censorship and detention laws, however, African leaders kept and expanded them. It was precisely because colonial rule was so psychologically demeaning to Africans in general and nationalist leaders in particular that post-independence African governments were so determined to expunge many of the colonial institutions. Since rule of law, accountable government, property rights and free trade were European imports, they had to go. Instead, many African leaders chose to emulate the political arrangements and economic policies of a rising power that represented the exact opposite of Western free market and liberal democracy – the Soviet Union. [...] Africa’s love affair with socialism persisted until the 1990s, when, at long last, Africa started to reintegrate into the global economy. Trade relations with the rest of the world were somewhat liberalised and African nations started to deregulate their economies, thus climbing up the rankings in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business report. That said, even today, Africa remains the least economically free and most protectionist continent in the world. That – and not free trade – is the problem."
#WYBMAE (0+1) / @o01eg / 776 дней назад
http://blog.extremehacking.org/blog/2017/07/31/hungarian-hacker-arrested-pressing-f12/ В кратце: в Будапеште за миллион баксов набыдлокодили систему продажи билетов на общественный транспорт с кучей багов, как например поле с суммой было readonly, но если поправить html в браузере, то можно цену поменять, а на бэкенде никто не стал проверку суммы делать. Пацанчик этот баг нашел, написал в саппорт, а через 2 недели его мусора загребли.
#FSE0VS (7+4) / @anarchy / 802 дня назад
Замечательно, Медуза, при всех её недостатках, открывает окно в англоязычные новости. Люди уже спрашивают про колорадскую ленточку: https://twitter.com/meduza_en/status/884475340441231362
#D7GC3S (0) / @o01eg / 828 дней назад
Проснулись наконец. Очень длинная, но очень качественная статья о России без каких-либо альт-райтовских иллюзий (даже про Кадырова и Дугина вспомнили): http://reason.com/archives/2017/07/07/russias-global-anti-libertaria "Russia's Global Anti-Libertarian Crusade How Vladimir Putin's desire for domination and acceptance is scrambling American politics. One of the surreal twists of the past year in American politics has been the rapid realignment in attitudes toward Russia. Democrats, many of whom believe that Russian interference was key to Donald Trump's unexpected victory last November, are now the ones sounding the alarm about the Russian threat. Meanwhile, quite a few Republicans—previously the keepers of the anti-Kremlin Cold War flame—have taken to praising President Vladimir Putin as a strong leader and Moscow as an ally against radical Islam. A CNN/ORC poll in late April found that 56 percent of Republicans see Russia as either "friendly" or "an ally," up from 14 percent in 2014. Over the same period, Putin's favorable rating from Republicans in the Economist/YouGov poll went from 10 percent to a startling 37 percent. The dominant narrative in the U.S. foreign policy establishment and mainstream media casts Putin as the implacable enemy of the Western liberal order—an autocratic leader at home who wants to weaken democracy abroad, using information warfare and covert activities to subvert liberal values and to promote Russia-friendly politicians and movements around the world. In this narrative, President Donald Trump is like the French nationalist Marine Le Pen, whose failed presidential campaign this year relied heavily on loans from Russian banks with Kremlin ties: a witting or unwitting instrument of subversion, useful to Putin either as an ideological ally or as an incompetent who will strengthen Russia's hand by destabilizing American democracy. At its extremes, the Russian subversion narrative relies on a great deal of conspiratorial thinking. It also far too easily absolves the Western political establishment of responsibility for its failures, from the defeat of European Union supporters in England's Brexit vote to Hillary Clinton's loss in last November's election. Putin makes a convenient boogeyman. Nonetheless, there is a real Russian effort to counter American—plus NATO and E.U.—influence by supporting authoritarian nationalist movements and groups, such as Le Pen's National Front, Hungary's quasi-fascist Jobbik Party, and Greece's neo-Nazi Golden Dawn. Today's Russia is no longer just a moderately authoritarian corrupt regime trying to maintain its regional influence. Cloaked in the mantle of religious and nationalist values, the Kremlin positions itself as a defender of tradition and sovereignty against the godless progressivism and the migrant hordes overtaking the West. It has a global propaganda machine and a network of political operatives dedicated to cultivating far-right and sometimes far-left groups in Europe and elsewhere. Tom Palmer, vice president for international programs at the Atlas Network, has been actively involved in projects promoting liberty in ex-Communist countries since the late 1980s; he has taken to warning against a new "global anti-libertarianism." Writing for the Cato Policy Report last December, Palmer noted that "Putin, the pioneer in the trend toward authoritarianism, has poured hundreds of millions of dollars into promoting anti-libertarian populism across Europe and through a sophisticated global media empire, including RT and Sputnik News, as well as a network of internet troll factories and numerous made-to-order websites." Slawomir Sierakowski of Warsaw's Institute for Advanced Study and Emma Ashford of the Cato Institute have also warned about the rise of an "Illiberal International" in which Russia plays a key role..."
#3S4X8J (1) / @o01eg / 831 день назад
В коем-то веке команда Навального вспомнила про иностранную аудиторию: https://fbk.info/english/press-releases/post/330/ "The Anti-Corruptions foundation’s documentary “Don’t call him Dimon” made Alisher Usmanov so furious that he recorded two video appeals to Alexey Navalny in a matter of just two days. He refutes all of the accusations talking in highly arrogant manner: he didn’t give bribes to Medvedev and other government officials, he has no real criminal past, all of the cases against him were fabricated. He is outraged and filed a lawsuit against Navalny for accusing him of rape. The ACF worked hard and found new documentary evidence. Yesterday Alexey Navalny presented them in the new video (with English subtitles). Mr. Usmanov diligently avoid answering the question about his first big money. Official version sounds like this: he manufactured plastic bags, then sold cigarettes, then went bankrupt, and then established a company called Interfin, in which his partners invested $10 million each, believing in Usmanov’s genius business acumen. Interfin company really did exist since 1995. But fortunately for the ACF from the moment of its establishment 40% of Interfin stock was owned by the British company Middlesex Holding PLC. The ACF read the accounts of this firm, and others, associated with it, for the last 20 years — that’s more than 2,000 pages. Those documents are a pure treasure as they show a real story of the Soviet asset privatization. In 1997 Usmanov crept into Gazprom and used Gazprom’s money to buy his own shares in the British company, and then, a bit later, sold them back to himself, but for less money. This was the moment that Usmanov and Dmitry Medvedev became such a good friends. Medvedev was the Chairman of Gazprom’s Board of Directors at that time and these scheme wouldn’t be possible without him. A lot was said about the honest taxpayer Usmanov. He brought to the budget half a billion dollars in the course of 10 years. Among all of his properties only his yacht costs this sum. He should’ve paid several times more. The entrepreneur Alisher Burkhanovich doesn’t sell Russian raw materials directly, but uses his own offshore intermediaries and sell through them with more than two-fold price difference. This tax evasion scheme is called transfer pricing. Alisher Burkhanovich repeatedly said the he is developing the internet. When in fact he took over the largest Russian social media Vkontakte after the regime wrestled it from its founder Pavel Durov. Durov refused to provide the security services with the personal information of users in groups that criticized the regime. Usmanov in turn introduced censorship and now we see weekly attempts to sentence people for likes and shares. And lastly about the lawsuit. Rape was among the accusations recounted by the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray. On his website one can find these lines: “Alisher Usmanov is a vicious thug, criminal, racketeer, heroin trafficker and accused rapist.” Mr. Murray was a public officer, who due to his position communicated with everyone in the leadership of Uzbekistan, had access to all the secret information and continues to insist on his statements. But somehow Usmanov didn’t take ambassador Murray to the British court and is trying to settle this case in Russian one where he can easily bring a suitcase with cash. Alexey Navalny: “I recommend that everyone watches it till the end, because this is an important story about how Russia is set up, how oligarchy is set up, and how officialdom is set up”."
#BQHEHG (0) / @o01eg / 869 дней назад
ipv6 ready BnW для ведрофона BnW на Реформале Викивач Котятки

Цоперайт © 2010-2016 @stiletto.