↑↑↓↓←→←→ⒷⒶ Войти !bnw Сегодня Клубы
Привет, TbI — HRWKA! 1069.8 пользователей не могут ошибаться! Официальная конфочка бнвача: bnw@conference.jabber.ru
?5998
говно5664
прекрасное5278
говнорашка4538
хуита3922
anime2663
linux2424
bnw2238
music2234
log2027
рашка1958
pic1866
ололо1731
быдло1410
украина1334
гімно1116
дыбр1084
роботы_не_одобряют1004
сталирасты859
bnw_ppl838

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Karamay_fire "Fire On December 8, 1994, 500 schoolchildren were taken to a special variety performance at a theatre in Karamay at Friendship Theatre (友谊馆). Most were the best and brightest pupils in their classes, aged between 7 and 14.[3] From the accounts of survivors, it appears that spotlights near the stage either short-circuited or fell. The curtain caught fire, then exploded, and fire engulfed the auditorium within a minute or two.[3] Controversy The first few seconds are the most crucial and controversial of the disaster. Survivors insist[citation needed] that a female official immediately stood up and shouted: "Students sit down; don’t move. Let the leaders walk out first (simplified Chinese: 同学们坐下、不要动、让领导先走。; traditional Chinese: 同學們坐下、不要動、讓領導先走。)" (Note: In Chinese, the order: 让领导先走 has since became a popular internet catch phrase, meaning the government officials have priority over ordinary folks in times of emergency). She has since been identified in online articles as Kuang Li (况丽), who was vice-director of the state petroleum company’s local education centre, though there has been no official confirmation of this.[3] The teachers obeyed, and the children remain seated. By the time the about 20 Communist Party officials had filed out through the only opened emergency exit, when all the other exits remained locked, it was too late. Teachers hurried the pupils out of their seats to other exits, only to find that the emergency exit doors were locked, and no one seem to care enough to get them opened. Parents and survivors alleged that Kuang took refuge in a ladies’ cloakroom that could have sheltered 30 people and barred the doors behind her. A 10-year-old boy said "My teacher asked me to run out of the theatre, but when I stood up the hall was smothered in smoke and fire. The power then cut out. People could see nothing. The place was full of crying and shouting."[3]"
#Y5400K (0+8) / @o01eg / 90 дней назад
https://stas.dreamwidth.org/1108484.html "В Броварде, по следам происшедшего в школе в Паркланде, решили ввести "разумные меры безопасности". А именно - все школьные рюкзаки и сумки теперь должны быть прозрачными и все ученики должны носить бэджики с именами. Как и полагается "разумным мерам" демократов, предложение полностью бесполезное и безумное, не добавляющее к безопасности ровно ничего, и только доставляющее неудобства тем, кого оно якобы призвано охранять. Показательно, что местные мини-хунвейбинчики, скандировавшие спущенные им из DNC лозунги "встанем как один, скажем не дадим", тут же предсказуемым образом возмутились - какой идиотизм, это же ничему не поможет, почему нас, не сделавших ничего плохого, наказывают за действия одного человека, причём таким дурацким и бессмысленным образом? Как вы смеете ущемлять наши права и покушаться на нашу приватность?! Почему мы должны страдать из-за идиотизма администрации и их неспособности сделать что-нибудь реальное для нашей безопасности? Причём, разумеется, пополам с этим возмущением они продолжают скандировать партийные речёвки, ничуть не ощущая диссонанса. Очень хочется счесть это тонким троллингом со стороны администрации, и если так, то я стоя аплодирую им, лучшей демонстрации безумия происходящего и придумать нельзя. Но по нынешним временам, отличить - особенно среди левых - тонкий - или даже толстый - троллинг от искреннего, горячего желания "сделать же что-нибудь" и "принять разумные меры" абсолютно не в человеческих силах, поэтому я не исключаю варианта, что эта прекрасная картинка нарисовалась сама собой, просто в силу самоогранизации обстоятельств."
#W6H1R0 (2+4) / @o01eg / 91 день назад
https://fee.org/articles/socialisms-sexist-origins/ "However, the origins of socialism are not as progressive as many of its adherents believe, certainly not on the point of women’s equality. In The Lost Literature of Socialism, Cambridge University historian George Watson points out that socialism was originally a conservative idea, and that many prominent socialists—seldom read even by their admirers—actually “hated progress and demanded a return to ancient values.” That included a return to traditional gender roles. Socialism Was a Reactionary Philosophy Socialism was arguably a reactionary response to how the Industrial Revolution transformed society. Industrialization created a class of nouveau riche who gained wealth through market transactions rather than by birthright, threatening the old order: “enfeebling traditional authority… and weakening hereditary influences.” Factories also brought women into the labor force en masse, granting them economic independence and bargaining power that altered family dynamics and disturbed old-fashioned sensibilities. In short, commoners and women were earning money, and traditionalists were aghast. The prominent Victorian social thinker John Ruskin wrote in his 1860 critique of capitalism, Unto the Last, that his aim was “to show the superiority of some men to others” and the wisdom of a hierarchical society that keeps “inferiors” in their place. Socialism presented an alternative to the unprecedented social mobility and rapid changes of the industrial age. Watson notes that many people felt the classical liberals advocating “free trade and the free market were rapidly destroying traditional patterns of life, loosening family ties and threatening morality itself”. As the socialist Bertolt Brecht once said: “Communism is not radical. It is capitalism that is radical.” “It is easy to forget that conservative interests were once fiercely critical of competitive wealth-creation and the commercial spirit,” as Watson puts it. (Today, too, entrenched interests often stand to gain most from regressive regulation of the economy). Socialism historically has resulted in the installation of hereditary systems of entrenched privilege, “since only privilege educates for the due exercise of centralized power in a planned economy.” Children of the bourgeoisie were relegated to a subordinate caste in the Soviet Union. Stalin’s eldest son, had he not died, would have been destined for high office. President Ceausescu of Romania gave his wife and son cabinet posts."
#HIDXZI (1+8) / @o01eg / 96 дней назад
Левая мысль развивается по диалектической спирали: https://sun1-1.userapi.com/c840536/v840536795/6090f/17UQ0YRv4TE.jpg
#001MSO (2+1) / @o01eg / 111 дней назад
Пока число убитых людьми социалистов не сравняется с числом людей, убитых социалистами, Россия не встанет с колен: https://twitter.com/msvetov/status/970616507221860352 "Все так радуются годовщине смерти Сталина, как будто руку к этому приложили. Сталин умер из-за болезни, в престарелом возрасте и при власти. Максимально успешный конец для диктатора. А режим, который он построил, номенклатура, которую он оставил, терзают нашу страну до сих пор. Чему вы радуетесь? Что Сталин ни за что не ответил? Что династии палачей, которые убивали наших родителей, всё ещё правят страной и лишают будущего наших детей? Что из русского народа продолжают делать манкуртов? Номенклатуре выгодно, чтобы собственное поражение вы отмечали как победу. И сегодня вы отмечаете не смерть Сталина, а своё смирение с его победой над нами. Потому что пока вы не требуете справедливости, вы празднуете собственное бессилие. Пока власть находится в руках номенклатуры, дело Сталина будет жить, а мы умирать."
#OK6ZAO (4+2) / @o01eg / 111 дней назад
Относясь к коммунистам как к людям, ты забиваешь гвоздь в свой собственный гроб: https://www.facebook.com/babchenkoa/posts/1313598932073670 "Рабочий Николай Емельянов, укрывавший Ленина с Зиновьевым в шалаше в Разливе, после революции участвовал в подавлении Кронштадского восстания, а потом вместе с женой провел в лагерях двадцать лет. Его старший сын был расстрелян в тридцать седьмом, второй сын был убит при попытке к бегству из лагеря. Родина тебя бросит, сынок. Всегда"
#U3TN4E (4+2) / @o01eg / 114 дней назад
Через культурное обогащение вперёд к первобытному коммунизму! http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/02/21/three-african-men-arrested-cannibalism-migrant-heavy-paris-suburb/ "Three men have been arrested in the heavily migrant-populated Paris suburb of Clichy-sous-Bois for attacking a man by biting at his face and then eating the pieces of flesh they had bitten off. The men, who all originally came from the African island nation of Cape Verde, were arrested on Sunday after they attacked a man who was walking in the Hector-Berlioz alley at around 6 pm and bit off pieces his ear and lower lip, Le Parisien reports. The victim was able to fight off the attackers, wounding one of them in the ankle, before police arrived a short time later and arrested the three Africans. Both the victim and the injured man were then taken to Montfermeil hospital. Clichy-sous-Bois has become infamous as one of the most troubled no-go zones surrounding the French capital. The massive riots that occurred in 2005 began in the area when a pair of teenagers running from the police killed themselves by hiding in an electric power station. Since then, Clichy-sous-Bois has been associated with further riots, as was the case last year, and with a connection to the rising tide of radical Islamic extremism in France."
#J504OB (0+1) / @o01eg / 120 дней назад
Когда борешься с коричневым фашизмом, а смерть принимаешь от красного фашизма: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DWkSBi0W0AEy5D0.jpg:orig
#RZY2HC (1+2) / @o01eg / 123 дня назад
Учёные выяснили, что левачьё менее толерантно к чужому мнению: https://medium.com/@NoahCarl/who-doesnt-want-to-hear-the-other-side-s-view-9a7cdf3ad702 "Who Doesn’t Want to Hear the Other Side’s View? People with left-wing/liberal views are more likely to block or unfriend their ideological counterparts than those with right-wing/conservative views The day after the 2015 UK General Election, Rebecca Roache––who is now a Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at Royal Holloway––wrote a blog post entitled, ‘If you’re a Conservative, I’m not your friend’. She began her blog post with the following statement: One of the first things I did after seeing the depressing election news this morning was check to see which of my Facebook friends ‘like’ the pages of the Conservatives or David Cameron, and unfriend them. (Thankfully, none of my friends ‘like’ the UKIP page.) Was Ms Roache’s decision an isolated incident, or was it part of a more general tendency for people with left-wing/liberal views to block or unfriend their ideological counterparts? In an attempt to answer this question, I tracked down as many relevant surveys and polls as I could. The results are presented below. In 2012, Pew Research found that liberals were more likely than conservatives to have blocked, unfriended or hidden someone they disagreed with on social networking sites."
#OF33EB (1+1) / @o01eg / 125 дней назад
https://arbat.dreamwidth.org/931890.html "9. VOX объясняет [ https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2018/2/8/16982036/nationalism-patriotism-left-right-trump-democrats-solidarity ], что левым не надо боятся национализма, наоборот, национальная солидарность - это старая, мощная тема для левых. Я согласен, что старая и мощная, но интересно, эти ребята помнят, как именно выглядит сплав левизны с национализмом?"
#X6V0GT (0+1) / @o01eg / 131 день назад
https://squawker.org/culture-wars/antifa-disrupts-lgbt-parade-claims-gay-people-are-offensive-to-muslims/ "Antifa Disrupts LGBT Parade; Claims Gay People Are Offensive To Muslims Whether we agree with their beliefs or not, Gay Pride Parades (for the most part) are well… gay. Happy. Bright. Enthusiastic and peaceful. They march around with rainbow flags, wear really weird clothing, and tell everybody how proud they are to be gay. Annoying? Most certainly, especially if you feel as though they’re shoving an agenda down your throat. But these marches tend to keep it fairly peaceful. When you start putting Sweden, Muslims, and Antifa into the mix, however, you have a recipe for disaster. Recently in Stockholm Sweden, a Gay pride event was held that caused a bit of controversy. Everything was going great until someone made a wrong turn. Specifically, those participating in the march entered a predominantly Muslim territory. What happened next is a little confusing, to say the least. Antifa (short for Anti-Fascists) hit the scene, and they were not at all pleased with the locations the Gay Pride marchers were choosing. Why? Because it was living proof that Muslims don’t support gays. Instead, in their own countries, they throw them off of bridges and stone them to death. One Sweedish Antifa member (clearly supporting communism) had this to say in an interview promoted by VFN: “It’s a propagation against the Muslim population here. I think it’s a private thing what gays do in the bed.” Yeah, that attire of her’s sure makes me wanna subscribe to Antifa! (That was sarcasm folks.) Antifa began calling out those in the march, saying how they’re “fascist” and “in the wrong”. The reporter who covered the event noted how some people were saying it was “a PR stunt, aimed at dividing communities.” But isn’t Antifa supposed to be pro-gay AND pro-Muslim? It seems that when they finally realized the tension between each community, they got triggered by the idea of having to choose one to side with. Whoever then, was to be the enemy, would have to be labeled as Nazi’s and fascists. So now, according to Antifa, gay people are racist Neo Nazi’s who only march in Muslim areas to be offensive to their opposition. More and more gays are being red pilled so to speak, with Milo Yiannopolos leading the revolution. After this incident, I wouldn’t be surprised if even greater numbers turned away from far left movements and joined the right side of political and social issues. Only time will tell, but we still have enough red pills to go around. "
#J7K5T5 (1+1) / @o01eg / 136 дней назад
https://twitter.com/StalinGulag/status/958260205376147457 «Вся нечисть с песьими головами восстала против Смерти Сталина потому, что фильм бьёт по самому уязвимому, по безгрешности власти. Режиссёр показывает: страшная, вечная, тирания падёт, что диктатор, нагоняющий ужас лежит обоссанный, жалкий, беспомощный...»
#OK1612 (0+2) / @o01eg / 145 дней назад
Опять проклятым антисоветчикам из правительства РФ не понравился фильм про хорошего Сталина.
#68NDJ3 (1+1) / @o01eg / 149 дней назад
Большевики победили в Гражданской войне, потому что только они воплотили русскую мечту — чтобы соседа за корову раскулачили!
#VED383 (2+2) / @o01eg / 157 дней назад
https://arbat.dreamwidth.org/925318.html?thread=47541382#cmt47541382 "Левые органически не способны представить себе общественное устройство, не основанное на игре с нулевой суммой." https://arbat.dreamwidth.org/925318.html?thread=47545734#cmt47545734 "Их модель экономики - та же самая семья охотников-собирателей. Богатство растет, его не производят. Если у кого-то много - то это потому, что он первый добежал, и собрал в свою корзинку что-то общее."
#55KVE0 (0+1) / @o01eg / 159 дней назад
Логика — это та вещь, в которую коммунисты не могут: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DToXZrmVwAADZ4m.jpg:orig
#3X569C (1+2) / @o01eg / 160 дней назад
--
ipv6 ready BnW для ведрофона BnW на Реформале Викивач Котятки

Цоперайт © 2010-2016 @stiletto.