нарешті gdb перепишуть на нормальную мову програмування: https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/cxx-conversion
#CVN7WW
(1+1)
/ @hate-engine / 3981 день назад
Huge C++ PATCH to merge c++-concepts branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00377.html
#119YU1
(0+1)
/ @hate-engine / 4013 дней назад
http://blog.maidsafe.net/2015/07/01/the-ants-are-coming/
"Soon after, heavily frustrated by the speed at which we were developing in C++, we started looking into ways to speed up development without a reduction in code quality, surely the holy grail of software development. After much research, David became increasingly convinced that a new systems-level language, Rust, had something to offer. In his spare time (between about 2 a.m. and 5 a.m.) he started transposing one of our most complex libraries, Self-Encryption (the component that seamlessly splits data into smaller chunks and encrypts them), over to Rust, which at that time wasn’t even in Beta yet. This was very successful and fast! David followed a similar process with MaidSafe’s Routing library. With another successful test complete our development team was split for a few weeks while the core team remained in C++ and another team started transposing the rest of the code.
This was a risky and scary time. To split the dev team at a period when we were under significant pressure to produce a stable network seemed counterintuitive. But thankfully, going backwards to move forward paid off, and without this change there is no doubt in our minds that we would not be where we are today. It is not the intention to go into detail here about how and whether Rust is better than C++. For debates on that subject you can check out some of the threads on the forum and elsewhere. I think that is a debate as contentious as GPL vs MIT, or even Borg vs MacEnroe, fun to debate but don’t expect consensus any time soon. All I can say is that it’s working for us and allows us to iterate quickly, be more defined with our tasks and be more definitive with our timescales."
Почему Base and Derived ковариантны, однако, shared_ptr<Base> and shared_ptr<Derived> - нет?
#0F2EHU
(11+1)
/ @ninesigns / 4056 дней назад
Угадайте не гугля откуда ента цитата:
Именно поэтому я считаю с++ программистов именно «Программистами» с большой буквы. Они как хирурги в современном мире программирования ) А остальные так… педиатры всякие, медбратья )
#2CZZZC
(20)
/ @ninesigns / 4065 дней назад
Предлагаю включить в стандарт ISO C++ следующую строчку. Ну, чтобы не было недоразумений.
Any program that written in C++ is ill-formed.#VMBKTS
(1+1)
/ @anonymous / 4084 дня назад
ДЕДФУД ПОСЛЕ СМЕРТИ В АДУ ТЫ БУДЕШЬ КОМПИЛЯТЬ КРЕСТОПАРАШУ НА АТОМЕ СУКА
#7NLYR2
(2+2)
/ @greenbastad / 4092 дня назад
>Most of the onboard autonomous driving software on MER and MSL is written in C++
#EGMJO3
(0+1)
/ @hate-engine / 4098 дней назад
путь к успеху: начало https://v1.std3.ru/70/40/1427403964-7040334ac7b8e3c3a8cde205f43d6b7f.jpg
#4F0FHW
(2+3)
/ @hirthwork / 4119 дней назад
Посоветуйте гайды по плюсовым шаблонам в адаптированом изложении для лиспера.
Заебало читать охуительные сообщеня об ошибках и тасовать туда-сюда куски кода в ожидании когда эта параша соберется.
#BYQ6FW
(24+1)
/ @ninesigns / 4133 дня назад
Чо напечатает эта программа?
inb4: нахуй пошел
#include <stdio.h>
class A {
bool m_init;
public:
A(){m_init = true; printf ("ctor\n");}
~A(){
printf ("dtor\n");
if (m_init) {
deinit();
}
}
void deinit () {
printf ("deinit!\n");
m_init = false;
}
};
int main() {
A a;
a.~A();
return 0;
}#W1T1Z3
(27)
/ @ninesigns / 4203 дня назад
ISO C++14 (ну почти): http://w.da.speling.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2014/n4141.pdf
#1SD58R
(6)
/ @anonymous / 4217 дней назад
А пока из могилы доносятся споры о лицензии: http://i.imgur.com/aiJpAEt.png
http://i.imgur.com/bCAIcxn.png
Цоперайт © 2010-2016 @stiletto.