https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/gk-current-affairs/story/yuri-gagarin-317499-2016-04-12 рубрика «тупые индусы» да еб твою мать

http://www.reallifestories.org/stories/1619/ рубрика «тупые пиндосы»

2019 год трансгуманисты дрочат на сингулярность, которая со дня на день наступит тем временем пик выработки ядерной энергии пройдет 13 лет назад потому что сложно дохуя, ну его на хуй

я просто чтобы не забыть запишу значит, 2019 год софтверная компания #1 на планете миллиард линий оф кода, тысячи программистов снимает рекламный видос чтобы профессионалов привлекать идет на сток и покупает govno pidor jopa, потому что направить камеру в ебучий экран ближайшего макбука слишком сложно

Один человек заболел депрессией и умер с голоду. Слышали такую историю? И я нет.

Вообще, глобальная потепление — хорошая религия. В том смысле, что она позволяет простому человеку вносить смысл в свою жизнь, ежедневно принимая решения типа «что лучше в плане уменьшения карбон футпринта — подтирать жопу бумагой или мыть водой?» «А вот я сегодня не просто сходил на улицу пробздеться — я отказался от поездки на автомобиле и внес свой вклад в решение глобальной проблемы!» Побольше бы таких религий.

Посоветуйте хорошего хостинг-провайдера в Украине, к которому можно привести своих сверверов (или арендовать) за вменяемые деньги, и к которому можно прокинуть свою собственную /24 подсеть.

Да ебаная, блять, клаудфлара.

В какой институт блоггерства надо пойти учиться, чтобы так махать руками?

Как долго хомо сапиенс может протянуть без кислорода в воздухе? Не без воздуха, блять, а с воздухом, которым дыши сколько влезет, но в котором кислорода нет совсем. В принципе, любители подышать гелием перед смертью должны знать. Никто не замерял?

Хочу завести себе инстаграмм-аккаунт. Где-нибудь есть описание инстаграммских понятий? А то страшно: не так потегаешь — в рейтингах опустят, или что у них там.

It is a matter of economic fact that, when Vladimir Putin says that liberalism is obsolete, he is talking the most tremendous tripe. Liberalism is alive. It is well. It is delivering prosperity on a scale unimaginable to previous generations. That is because a society that is free and inclusive and open will – on the whole – be the best place to start a business. It will be the safest place to invest. It will be the best place to start a family. It will be the best place to live. And there could be no better example of the triumph of liberal values, of course, than Britain today. There are all sorts of reasons why London and the South East are the most productive regions of the whole of Europe. There is the time zone. There is the language. There are the historic agglomerations of talent in the arts, culture, business and financial services. But there is something even more important; and that is the British sense of freedom to live your life as you choose – provided you do no harm to others – without the fear of persecution, or judgment, or discrimination. Those liberal values have come to define not just the metropolis, but the whole of the UK; and it has been fascinating to observe, over the last couple of decades, as the other great cities have come to emulate and even to surpass the spirit of the capital: youthful, diverse, energetic, tech-savvy, open-minded. The economic blessings of that modern British culture are obvious. We lead the world in cutting-edge technologies of all kinds – from bioscience to batteries. We have the world’s greatest universities, with an unrivalled record in producing original research – and never forget that one in seven of the world’s kings, queens, presidents and prime ministers were educated in this country, to say nothing of the Emperor of Japan. We have the world’s most versatile and successful musicians. We invent the most global television formats. We are always trying something new, as I have seen in the course of the last few days’ campaigning – whether it is exporting wine to America (up 177 per cent) or lightweight ultra low-carbon ships – made in Cowes and sold to Mexico. We are the home of innovation and creativity; and there are two basic advantages we have, the fundamental guarantors and guardians of this sense of social freedom. There is democracy, and there is the rule of law. Each depends on the other. Each is vital. Each confers a basic and crucial equality on every person in the country. The country that possesses these essential building blocks of liberalism will succeed; the country without them will – eventually – face disaster. To put it simply, if your property can be arbitrarily confiscated by the wife of the president, or by his son-in-law, then you won’t start a business in that country and you won’t invest. If you can lose a contract unfairly to some politician’s chum, then you won’t bother to put your money there. And if there is no way that politician can be democratically removed, then corruption will increase, and inefficiency will increase, and the people will suffer, and poverty will grow. I don’t want to put too fine a point on it, Vladimir, but there are some countries where capitalism is believed to be in the hands of oligarchs and cronies, where journalists are shot, and where “liberal values” are derided, and where according to the Russian statistics agency Rosstat, a third of the country cannot afford to buy more than two pairs of shoes per year; where 12 per cent of the population still has to rely on an outdoor toilet, and where real incomes have declined for each of the past five years. I cannot therefore stress too much the importance of liberal values in actually putting bread on the table. There is a direct connection between social and political freedom – and long-term and sustainable economic prosperity. There is a direct connection between the liberal values – of democracy and the rule of law – and successful wealth creation, because corruption and gangsterism and kleptocracy will eventually strangle economic growth. That is why these liberal values are essential; and the cardinal beauty of liberal democracy is that each person is equal. Everyone is equal under the law. Each person has an equal say – an equal franchise – at elections. Which takes us to the great national question, which we are taking so painfully long to resolve. One of the problems with the EU, as it has developed over the past 45 years of our membership, is that it has begun seriously to undermine that fundamental characteristic of a liberal democracy: that the people should have the power, at elections, to remove those who make the laws. The EU system makes this impossible. Over the years, successive treaties have centralised power in Brussels, in a way that is understood by a tiny minority – who can always be sure of knocking on the right door in the Berlaymont, or paying someone to do so on their behalf – but which is wholly opaque to the broad mass of the public. That was one of the reasons people voted to leave, and that is why it is so essential that we get on with it now and carry out that mandate by October 31. If we fail yet again, and kick the can down the road, we will continue to undermine trust in politics. If we say that it is not a “hard” deadline, we will fuel the suspicion that there is a conspiracy by the elite to frustrate the will of the people. And people will reasonably wonder, if October 31 is not the “hard” deadline, then what is? Is it Christmas? The Greek calends? If we fail yet again, and especially if we thereby increase the risk that the EU demands another referendum before we have delivered the first, we will make a mockery of democracy. We will look like any other oligarchy or monarchy – and there are, alas, still many examples around the world – where votes are held and the people are nominally consulted, but no one takes any notice, because, as in Moscow, the same crew mysteriously stays in charge. If we want to uphold liberal values, we must leave by October 31 – and we will. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/06/30/will-prove-vladimir-putin-wrong-leaving-eu-october-31/

А вот вам задание на ночь. Не надо представлять свою мечту...Представляйте СТРОГО ЦЕЛЬ! ...Ты едешь на новеньком Крузаке. Его запах и мягкость сидений подкупили тебя еще тогда, когда ты впервые приметил этого монстра 4х4 в автосалоне. Ты катишь по дороге, как по хайвейу, смотришь на нищеебушек в автобусак и говновозах....Дома тебя ждет ОНА, одна из твоих девченок. Ты даришь ей новый айфон, взятый на сдачу без кредита, она смиренно прыгая, вешается тебе на плечи руками. В отличие от говноебов которые дарят своим кривозубым крокодайлам цветы, чтобы раскаяться в измене, ты даришь ей сладостные оковы, которые навечно будут держать ее у твоей руки. Ты - живешь. В СВОЕЙ квартире, СВОЕЙ машине. Иди к этому...

Белая, как считают следователи, подумав, что ребенок неизбежно умрет, и это испортит статистику роддома (и снизит шанс ее утверждения в должности), «а также желая сэкономить затрачиваемые на поддержание жизнеобеспечения новорожденного ресурсы родильного дома приняла решение об убийстве новорожденного».

Прости нас, Вернер, мы на Марс не слетали. Прости, фон Браун, мы все проебали.

22 работодателя России отказали мне в работе конструктора под давлением спецслужб России.