В педивикии обычно более формальный и менее разговорный язык, это как минимум. Хотя у иных либертариев тоже тот ещё стиль, особенно у тех, кто начинали как юристы или философы.

я просто часть текста игнорирую, чтобы не залипать

Вот, например, когда я читал про хоумстединг, натолкнулся на цитату из Хоппе: >Further, if one were not allowed to appropriate other resources through homesteading action, i.e., by putting them to use before anybody else does, or if the range of objects to be homesteaded were somehow limited, this would only be possible if ownership could be acquired by mere decree instead of by action. However, this does not qualify as a solution to the problem of ethics, i.e., of conflict-avoidance, even on purely technical grounds, for it would not allow one to decide what to do if such declarative claims happened to be incompatible. More decisive still, it would be incompatible with the already justified self-ownership, for if one could appropriate resources by decree, this would imply that one could also declare another person’s body to be one’s own. Thus, anyone denying the validity of the homesteading principle—whose recognition is already implicit in arguing two persons’ mutual respect for each other’s exclusive control over his own body—would contradict the content of his proposition through his very act of proposition making. Должен признать, я всегда считал, что сносно владею английским, всё-таки живу в англоязычной стране, учусь тут в универе и периодически дискутирую по-английски на разные темы. Но чтобы распарсить этот абзац мне потребовалось минут пять, если не больше.