Fanta originated as a result of difficulties importing Coca-Cola syrup into Nazi Germany during World War II due to a trade embargo.[1] To circumvent this, Max Keith, the head of Coca-Cola Deutschland (Coca-Cola GmbH) during the Second World War, decided to create a new product for the German market, using only ingredients available in Germany at the time, including whey and apple pomace – the "leftovers of leftovers", as Keith later recalled.[1][2] The name was the result of a brief brainstorming session, which started with Keith's exhorting his team to "use their imagination" (Fantasie in German), to which one of his salesmen, Joe Knipp, immediately retorted "Fanta!"[2]
The plant was effectively cut off from Coca-Cola headquarters during the war. After the war, the Coca-Cola corporation regained control of the plant, formula and the trademarks to the new Fanta product—as well as the plant profits made during the war.[1][2]
Fanta was discontinued when the parent company was reunited with the German branch. Following the launch of several drinks by the Pepsi corporation in the 1950s, Coca-Cola competed by relaunching Fanta in 1955.
Министерство промышленности и торговли рассматривает возможность ввести ограничения на продажу спиртного и сигарет для ритейлеров, не вступивших в создаваемый Совет рынка, пишет «Коммерсант».
Для тех ритейлеров и поставщиков, которые не войдут в создаваемое некоммерческое партнерство, Минпромторг предлагает устанавливать ряд ограничений. В том числе, розничным сетям запретят работать в выходные и праздничные дни, продавать подакцизные товары (алкоголь и табак) и открывать новые гипер- и супермаркеты в городах.
рыночно // https://meduza.io/news/2016/03/03/minpromtorg-nameren-ogranichit-prodazhu-alkogolya-i-tabaka
https://pp.vk.me/c543107/v543107082/16c1e/fb8QBEoQFCw.jpg
типичный гендерный фашизм
В Ставрополе начался суд над блогером Виктором Красновым, которому вменяется оскорбление чувств верующих во время спора в социальной сети «ВКонтакте».
Осенью 2014 года Краснов написал в соцсети комментарий незнакомцу со словами «Бога нет», а также назвал Библию в споре «сборником еврейских сказок».
https://meduza.io/news/2016/03/02/v-stavropole-nachali-sudit-ateista-za-slova-boga-net
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CcYjApsXIAAPd9Q.jpg:large
Нисколько не сомневаюсь что психосектанты действительно в это верят. Они и свои преступления точно так же оправдывают.
Мать-одиночка из Екатеринбурга Екатерина Вологженинова, которую суд признал виновной по статье 282 УК РФ за посты в соцсетях, включена в «Перечень террористов и экстремистов» Росфинмониторинга. В списке Вологженинова фигурирует под номером 1188.
Alienation of affections is a common law tort, abolished in many jurisdictions. Where it still exists, an action is brought by a deserted spouse against a third party alleged to be responsible for the failure of the marriage. The defendant in an alienation of affections suit is typically an adulterous spouse's lover, although family members, counselors and therapists or clergy members who have advised a spouse to seek divorce have also been sued for alienation of affections. As of 2016, six US states (Hawaii, North Carolina, Mississippi, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Utah) recognize this tort.
Million dollar verdicts have not been uncommon in North Carolina for alienation of affection and emotional distress.[6] In March 2010, a wife won a $9 million suit against her husband's mistress.[7] In another 2010 case, a wife successfully sued her former friend who allegedly seduced her husband while the friend was visiting the couple at their North Carolina home, resulting in the second highest award ever received in such suits.[8] A Mecklenburg County jury awarded $1.4 million in May 2001 to a former wrestling coach against P, after the coach's wife left him for P (the jury verdict was later reduced by the NC Court of Appeals as excessive). A year 2000 verdict of $86,250 for alienation of affections and $15,000 for criminal conversation in the case of Pharr v. Beck, from Burke county was upheld on appeal. In 1997, in the case of Hutelmyer v. Cox, the Plaintiff wife was awarded $1 million against her husband's secretary who "dressed sexy at work" and had an affair with him destroying their marriage.[6]
