Листаю тут книжку http://wiki.humanobs.org/_media/public:events:agi-summerschool-2012:psi-oup-version-draft-jan-08.pdf >Let me invite you to a journey into what might be seen as a piece of really old fashioned Artificial Intelligence research >Yet, there is reason to believe that despite inevitable difficulties and methodological problems, the design of unified architectures modeling the breadth of mental capabilities in a single system is a crucial stage in understanding the human mind, one that has to be faced by researchers working where the different sciences concerned with human abilities and information processing interface. >The peculiarity lent by the constructionist stance to AI sadly did not attract many philosophers into the labs of the computer science department (although it attracted some, see for instance Boden 1977, 2004; Pollock 1995; Haugeland 1985, 1992; Sloman 1978), and it seems AI yet has some distance to cover before it may announce a complete success in its quest. Yet, every failure also helps to shed some light, because an approach not working is a hypothesis falsified А и правда, почему философы, психологи и прочие так мало пытались строить численные версии своих словесных моделей и онтологий и проводить повторяемые вычислительные эксперименты однозначно демонстрирующие их производительность в решении когнитивных задач? Ладно даже, забудем пока про когнитивные эксперименты уровня людей, но почему например симуляций моделей поведения насекомых почти не было?