Обнаружил у себя в прыщах четыре ортогональных (и юзаемых) способа сказать "открывать вот это говно вон той софтиной":
- XDG-ассоциации
- их оверрайды в прыщелисе
- mailcap для mutt
- конфиг ranger
По собранной за полтора месяца инфе, сплю в среднем 7.710077519379846 часа в сутки. За период сбора данных был разбужен будильником лишь однажды, да и то после довольно продолжительного сна у друзяки на хате не по своей инициативе. Наверное, пора заканчивать с логгированием и экспериментами вокруг него, ибо вроде всё устраивает. Разве что эффект от регулярных занятий йогой замерять, когда они будут.
Initially, the experiment began fairly well as the learner repeated back the correct answers. However, when the learner began to make errors, the teacher was instructed by the man in the white coat to administer punishment shocks. Of course, the actor in the next room was not really receiving any shocks but duly gave a more and more distressing performance as the intensity of the punishment shocks increased. At first, he started to complain that the shocks hurt. Then they were painful. As the punishment voltages increased, so did the intensity of the screams. Soon, the learner was pleading with the teacher and telling him that he had a heart condition. Many of the participants protested that they could not go on but the man in the white coat replied impassively, "Please continue." At this point, the teachers were clearly stressed, shaking, and sweating, and yet they went on. Even after the intercom went silent and they reached the 20th level of 300 volts, they were told that the learner's failure to answer the question was an error and that the teacher must proceed with the punishment.
What do you think you would do in such a situation? Before Milgram had started his study, he consulted a panel of 40 psychiatrists and asked what they predicted that members of the public would do. As experts on human psychology, they agreed that less than one in 100 participants would go all the way to the end. How wrong could they be? It turned out that two out of every three of the participants in Milgram's shocking study went all the way to the end at 450 volts. They were prepared to kill another human being at the request of the man in the white coat.
In a later study that would never get ethical approval today, researchers conducted the almost identical experiment using puppies punished with real electric shocks. This time there was no charade. The animals were clearly suffering (although they were not receiving lethal shocks and the voltages were way below the descriptions the teachers thought they were administering). Half of the male teachers went all the way to the maximum punishment and, surprisingly, all of the female teacher participants obeyed the order to give the maximum shocks.
Чят, посоветуй психиатра БЕСПЛАТНО БЕЗ СМС БЕЗ РЕГИСТРАЦИИ
Вощем, по мнению IOM про хлорид наука ничего не знает и предпочитает считать, что его нормик столько, сколько человечина съедает в форме поваренной соли, считая по потребности в натрии, так что буду считать, что мои пять граммов с лишним в день - это нормик.
Re потение и потери натрия:
Conn (1949) demonstrated that healthy persons sweating 5 to 9 L/day could maintain sodium chloride balance on intakes ranging from as low as 1.9 g (83 mmol)/day to 3.2 g (139 mmol)/day of sodium chloride, the maximum intake provided.
Нашёл няшную книжку про электролиты: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2004/Dietary-Reference-Intakes-Water-Potassium-Sodium-Chloride-and-Sulfate.aspx